<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Graham Gover Solicitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk</link>
	<description>Excellence through specialism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time-limited permissions: do conditions survive?</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2012/01/time-limited-permissions-do-conditions-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2012/01/time-limited-permissions-do-conditions-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir David Keene delivered a judgement on what was an entirely novel point of law: do conditions remain enforceable after the expiry of a planning permission which was granted for a limited time? His answer in this case was &#8220;No&#8221;. <p /> The planning permission in question was for 42 holiday bungalows subject to <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2012/01/time-limited-permissions-do-conditions-survive/">Time-limited permissions: do conditions survive?</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2012/01/time-limited-permissions-do-conditions-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful appeal against enforcement notice</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/successful-appeal-against-enforcement-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/successful-appeal-against-enforcement-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/successful-appeal-against-enforcement-notice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I recently acted for a client who had been served with an enforcement notice requiring the removal of a residential caravan in the grounds of his house in East Dorset. My client purchased the land less than ten years before the service of the notice and it was present on the land at <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/successful-appeal-against-enforcement-notice/">Successful appeal against enforcement notice</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/successful-appeal-against-enforcement-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed changes to listed building control</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/proposed-changes-to-listed-building-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/proposed-changes-to-listed-building-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/proposed-changes-to-listed-building-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has just announced proposals to introduce new legislation &#8220;when parliamentary time allows&#8221; that will assist owners of listed buildings and developers to understand in respect of each listed building what changes can be made without the need for prior listed building consent. <p /> There is a common misunderstanding by some owners <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/proposed-changes-to-listed-building-control/">Proposed changes to listed building control</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/proposed-changes-to-listed-building-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chancellor&#8217;s Autumn Statement and planning</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/chancellors-autumn-statement-and-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/chancellors-autumn-statement-and-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/chancellors-autumn-statement-and-planning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ <p class="p1">The Chancellor&#8217;s Autumn Statement contained many welcome proposals to reform the planning system.</p> <p class="p1">The Statement stressed the need for planning reforms and included the promise of a review of the appeals process to make it faster and transparent, with proposals for implementation in summer 2012.&#160;An Infrastructure Plan set out a pipeline <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/chancellors-autumn-statement-and-planning/">Chancellor&#8217;s Autumn Statement and planning</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/12/chancellors-autumn-statement-and-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning &#8211; conditions precedent</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/11/planning-conditions-precedent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/11/planning-conditions-precedent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/11/planning-conditions-precedent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Appeal has recently revisited the tricky issue of the wording of a condition and whether it amounts to a prohibition of the commencement of development without the agreement of specified works. <p /> In that case, condition 4 of the planning agreement stated: &#8220;Before any work is commenced on the site <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/11/planning-conditions-precedent/">Planning &#8211; conditions precedent</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/11/planning-conditions-precedent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burger and chips &#8211; a second helping</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/10/burger-and-chips-a-second-helping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/10/burger-and-chips-a-second-helping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/10/burger-and-chips-a-second-helping/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reported in a previous post that the high court had upheld a local resident&#8217;s claim that the local planning authority could take into account the proximity of a school to a proposed fast-food takeaway where that school had a healthy-eating policy.&#160;</p> A Yorkshire council attempted to apply that principle when opposing an appeal against <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/10/burger-and-chips-a-second-helping/">Burger and chips &#8211; a second helping</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/10/burger-and-chips-a-second-helping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affecting the setting of listed buildings</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/affecting-the-setting-of-listed-buildings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/affecting-the-setting-of-listed-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/affecting-the-setting-of-listed-buildings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent case of&#160;R (Garner) v Elmbridge BC&#160;is important to our understanding of proposals that will affect the setting of a listed building. <p /> The listed building in this case is arguably one of the most important in the country, Hampton Court Palace. The proposed building was a hotel to be sited next <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/affecting-the-setting-of-listed-buildings/">Affecting the setting of listed buildings</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/affecting-the-setting-of-listed-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election to Legal Associate of the Royal Town Planning Institute</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/election-to-legal-associate-of-the-royal-town-planning-institute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/election-to-legal-associate-of-the-royal-town-planning-institute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/election-to-legal-associate-of-the-royal-town-planning-institute/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 30th August I was pleased to be informed that I had been elected to the Legal Associate membership of the Royal Town Planning Institute. <p /> My assessor&#8217;s comments were: <p /> &#8220;The Candidate shows a good depth of general experience in planning law. His employment history is sound with a wide variety <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/election-to-legal-associate-of-the-royal-town-planning-institute/">Election to Legal Associate of the Royal Town Planning Institute</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/09/election-to-legal-associate-of-the-royal-town-planning-institute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demolition &#8211; new burdens for developers</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/08/demolition-new-burdens-for-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/08/demolition-new-burdens-for-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/08/demolition-new-burdens-for-developers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked to advise a client who wanted to find a legitimate way to demolish a hotel that was locally listed. Planning permission for an extension had been refused, and local listing meant that demolition was &#8216;discouraged&#8217;, but not prohibited. Demolition also meant that prior notice had to be given to the <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/08/demolition-new-burdens-for-developers/">Demolition &#8211; new burdens for developers</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/08/demolition-new-burdens-for-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems with OS X 10.7 Lion printer drivers solved</title>
		<link>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/07/problems-with-os-x-10-7-lion-printer-drivers-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/07/problems-with-os-x-10-7-lion-printer-drivers-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geegovah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/07/problems-with-os-x-10-7-lion-printer-drivers-solved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently sounded off about the change to OS X Lion causing problems with unsupported software. One major casualty was Dropbox, but that was caused by the fact that I had not upgraded to the latest version. That was due in part to Dropbox being uncharacteristically poor at informing clients of the availability of <p>Continue reading <a href="http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/07/problems-with-os-x-10-7-lion-printer-drivers-solved/">Problems with OS X 10.7 Lion printer drivers solved</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ggsolicitor.co.uk/2011/07/problems-with-os-x-10-7-lion-printer-drivers-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

